Hello, this is Sergei.
I’m preparing for two workshops next week — in Riga and Berlin — and have been going through a number of reports and studies on AI search, AEO, and GEO.
For example:
Despite being just ~1% of traffic today, AI search could surpass traditional search by early 2028, according to Semrush — assuming current growth trends hold.
And there is one thing that looks very important for news media (especially for small, local and niche).
AI visibility ≠ Google ranking.
Ranking #1 on Google gives you only a 33% chance of appearing in AI Overviews.
Around 28% of ChatGPT’s top-cited pages have zero Google visibility.
Overlap between AI answers and Google results is surprisingly low.
In simple terms: different rules apply.
To be visible in AI answers, content needs to be:
clear and well-structured
direct in answering questions
fact-based and properly sourced
Recency also matters more than expected.
85% of AI citations come from content published in the last 2 years
Up to 50% comes from content published this year
This lowers the barrier. You don’t need years of authority — you need relevant, well-structured content now.
And the most important part:
Up to 80% of AI-cited content doesn’t rank in Google’s top 100
Only a small share comes from top search results
AI systems don’t prioritize domain authority. They prioritize extractable, precise answers.
Which means a small newsroom can compete. A single well-structured, clearly sourced article can outperform larger publishers — if it answers the question directly.
New on AI For Newsroom this week
Stories, guides, initiatives, and signals we surfaced in this issue.
Get the weekly email digest
One curated Friday roundup for newsrooms. No spam — you can unsubscribe anytime.